Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements

Non-Compete Agreements

In both New York and New Jersey, non-compete agreements are supposed to protect the employer’s legitimate interests, such as its confidential information and trade secrets. Critics of non-competes claim they limit employees’ abilities to find another job and negotiate a raise.

In early 2024 New York came close to banning noncompete agreements in employment contracts in New York, however Governor Hochul vetoed the proposed law which would have banned them. Opponents claim they stifle competition and negatively affect the labor market.

Many companies utilize non-competition agreements to protect themselves from competing businesses. In New York, they are unenforceable in situations where an employee is terminated for reasons other than gross misconduct. While they may be challenged in the future, companies desiring to create enforceable noncompete agreements should be aware of the best practices in formulating enforceable agreements that will sustain a legal challenge. For example, in both New York and New Jersey a non-compete may not be enforced if it imposes an undue hardship on an employee or is unduly harmful to the public. In practice, a company should articulate the legitimate business reason for the noncompete and limit their term as well as geography and their scope (i.e. by a certain industry sector) where appropriate. Because there is pressure from the labor-side on noncompete agreements, the law should continue to be monitored and taken into consideration.

Lawyer business woman working or reading lawbook in office workplace for consultant lawyer concept.
rs=w_1440,h_1440 (16)

Non-Solicitation Agreements

Non-solicitation agreements are often confused with non-compete agreements. While a non-solicitation agreement can also be called a non-compete agreement, more commonly a non-solicitation agreement only pertains to a company’s business contacts. An example of the important difference between a non-compete and a non-solicitation agreement is that while a non-compete agreement may prohibit from accepting a position with a competing business, a non-solicitation agreement restricts an employee from contacting a company’s clients, customers or employees after leaving the company. Non-solicitation agreements are more generally accepted by the Court’s and will benefit companies, especially in areas where it is competing with other businesses. Non-solicitation agreements should be carefully crafted and tailored to meet a businesses needs, especially as they are more likely to be enforceable even in the changing legal landscape of restrictive covenants.